Cancers, Vol. 16, Pages 3845: Risk of Postoperative Hemorrhage After Glioma Surgery in Patients with Preoperative Acetylsalicylic Acid

Cancers, Vol. 16, Pages 3845: Risk of Postoperative Hemorrhage After Glioma Surgery in Patients with Preoperative Acetylsalicylic Acid

Cancers doi: 10.3390/cancers16223845

Authors: Anatoli Pinchuk Nikolay Tonchev Claudia A. Dumitru Belal Neyazi Klaus-Peter Stein I. Erol Sandalcioglu Ali Rashidi

Background/Objectives: Patients with gliomas show an increased risk of spontaneous hemorrhages throughout the disease. Simultaneously, the number of patients taking acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for primary and secondary prophylaxis is rising in daily clinical practice, and interrupting ASA intake before elective or emergency intracranial surgery is not always feasible. This study aims to evaluate the risks associated with continuing ASA use perioperatively while focusing on hemorrhage and potential thromboembolic events that may arise from discontinuing ASA, particularly in multimorbid patients undergoing glioma surgery. Methods: The clinical parameters and imaging data of 7149 patients who underwent intracranial surgery in our department over a 10-year period were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their ASA status: Group 1 (no ASA impact) included those with no ASA use or who discontinued ASA use more than seven days prior to surgery (low stroke or cardiovascular risk), and Group 2 (ASA impact) included those who continued ASA use within seven days prior to operation (high stroke or cardiovascular risk). Results: In this retrospective study, data from 650 patients with various types of glial tumors who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2018 were examined. Of these patients, 50 experienced a postoperative hemorrhage (POH), and 10 required reoperations due to clinical neurological deterioration and increased intracranial pressure caused by the space-occupying effect of the hemorrhage. In the ASA impact group, 2.7% developed POH, compared to 1.3% in the no ASA impact group (p = 0.098). Our analysis did not show a significantly increased risk of POH after surgery, although patients in the ASA impact group had a one- to two-fold higher risk of developing POH overall. Additionally, other factors contributing to postoperative hemorrhage following glioma surgery were investigated and evaluated. Conclusions: In this cohort, the perioperative use of ASA was not associated with an increased rate of hemorrhagic complications after intracranial glioma surgery, although a trend was observed. In patients with high stroke and cardiovascular risk, ASA can be continued during elective brain tumor surgery.