IJERPH, Vol. 20, Pages 5870: Clinicians’ and Users’ Views and Experiences of a Tele-Mental Health Service Implemented Alongside the Public Mental Health System during the COVID-19 Pandemic

IJERPH, Vol. 20, Pages 5870: Clinicians’ and Users’ Views and Experiences of a Tele-Mental Health Service Implemented Alongside the Public Mental Health System during the COVID-19 Pandemic

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105870

Authors: Anton Isaacs Eleanor K. L. Mitchell Keith Sutton Michael Naughton Rochelle Hine Shane Bullock Denise Azar Darryl Maybery

A tele-mental health model called Head to Health was implemented in the state of Victoria, Australia to address the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. It was a free centralized intake service that adopted a targeted approach with several novel elements, such as stepped care and telehealth. This study examines the views and experiences of clinicians and service users of the tele-mental health service in the Gippsland region of Victoria during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data from clinicians were obtained via an online 10-item open-ended survey instrument and from service users through semi-structured interviews. Data were obtained from 66 participants, including 47 clinician surveys and 19 service user interviews. Six categories emerged from the data. They were: ‘Conditions where use of tele-mental health is appropriate’, ‘Conditions where tele-mental health may not be useful’, ‘Advantages of tele-mental health’, ‘Challenges in using tele-mental health’, ‘Client outcomes with tele-mental health’, and ‘Recommendations for future use’. This is one of a few studies where clinicians’ and service users’ views and experiences have been explored together to provide a nuanced understanding of perspectives on the efficacy of tele-mental health when it was implemented alongside public mental health services.