Sensors, Vol. 24, Pages 6033: A LiDAR-Camera Joint Calibration Algorithm Based on Deep Learning

2 days ago 76

Sensors, Vol. 24, Pages 6033: A LiDAR-Camera Joint Calibration Algorithm Based on Deep Learning

Sensors doi: 10.3390/s24186033

Authors: Fujie Ren Haibin Liu Huanjie Wang

Multisensor (MS) data fusion is important for improving the stability of vehicle environmental perception systems. MS joint calibration is a prerequisite for the fusion of multimodality sensors. Traditional calibration methods based on calibration boards require the manual extraction of many features and manual registration, resulting in a cumbersome calibration process and significant errors. A joint calibration algorithm for a Light Laser Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and camera is proposed based on deep learning without the need for other special calibration objects. A network model constructed based on deep learning can automatically capture object features in the environment and complete the calibration by matching and calculating object features. A mathematical model was constructed for joint LiDAR-camera calibration, and the process of sensor joint calibration was analyzed in detail. By constructing a deep-learning-based network model to determine the parameters of the rotation matrix and translation matrix, the relative spatial positions of the two sensors were determined to complete the joint calibration. The network model consists of three parts: a feature extraction module, a feature-matching module, and a feature aggregation module. The feature extraction module extracts the image features of color and depth images, the feature-matching module calculates the correlation between the two, and the feature aggregation module determines the calibration matrix parameters. The proposed algorithm was validated and tested on the KITTI-odometry dataset and compared with other advanced algorithms. The experimental results show that the average translation error of the calibration algorithm is 0.26 cm, and the average rotation error is 0.02°. The calibration error is lower than those of other advanced algorithms.

Read Entire Article